Concision
Three layers, in order. Layer 1 isolates the decision with nothing else in the way. Layer 2 hides it inside a full item, the way the exam does. Layer 3 reads your errors back to you and says what to repeat.
Work them in sequence — the diagnosis at the end only means something if you have your Layer 2 results in front of you.
| Cut to | What was wrong | |
|---|---|---|
| D1 | The delay was because the permit had not been issued | due to the fact that is five words for one |
| D2 | If the sensor fails… | same, four words for one |
| D3 | …cooperated throughout the season | cooperate already means together |
| D4 | Currently the data remain inconclusive | at this point in time is four words for one |
| D5 | The laboratory can process samples overnight | has the ability to is four words for one |
| D6 | She decided to withdraw the application | a verb turned into a noun plus a weak verb |
| D7 | The trial was halted because three participants withdrew | the reason … is because says it twice |
| D8 | Planning prevented… | planning is necessarily in advance |
| D9 | He referred to the estimate… | refer already means going back |
| D10 | Many observers believe the projection is optimistic | there are … who delays the subject for nothing |
The two patterns underneath all ten. First, a phrase standing in for a single connective — due to the fact that, in the event that, at this point in time. Second, a verb buried inside a noun — made a decision for decided, has the ability for can. Both are habits of formal writing, and both are always the wrong answer here.
Now the same decision, buried in a sentence with other things going on. Read the whole sentence, find where the options split, settle one axis at a time.
One word for five. A, B, C and E are all variants of the same padding, and the fact that four of the five options are padded is itself the signal — when most options are long and one is short, concision is the axis.
Two redundancies, not one. Cooperate means to work together, so together is dead. And a survey two agencies cooperate on is necessarily joint, so joint is dead too. E removes one and keeps the other; B and D shuffle the same words. Only C removes both.
Four words for one. C, D and E are longer still — a reliable sign that the item is testing concision and the short option is correct.
Can replaces has the ability to. C is the same construction in different clothes. B and D are ungrammatical: able to be processing and capable to process are both wrong, and D specifically breaks the idiom from Axis 8 — capable of, never capable to.
Note the order of operations: D is eliminated on grammar before length ever enters the discussion.
The reason … is because states the causal relationship twice. C says it once. A, B, D and E all keep the doubled construction in some form.
Correct as written, and the shortest. B through E are progressively more elaborate ways of saying decided. This is the item that confirms concision is real: when the underlined portion is already the leanest correct version, A is the answer.
There are … who pushes the real subject three words back for no gain. C puts A number of researchers in front where it belongs. B is the same construction in the present perfect. D turns the sentence into a fragment. E is a cleft with no purpose.
Here the shortest option is broken, which is the whole point of the item. B — flawed and recommended — drops the verb was, leaving the design flawed, which is not a clause. A, C and E all mismatch was flawed against a participle. Only D pairs two past-tense verbs: was flawed and recommended.
Concision is a tiebreaker between grammatically equal options. It is never a reason to choose a broken one.
Check your Layer 2 answers against this. The pattern of what you missed matters more than how many.
| If you missed | It means | Repeat | Your answers |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1, 3, 5 | Padded connectives not recognised on sight | D1, D2, D4, D7 | |
| 2 | Redundancy not recognised | D3, D8, D9 | |
| 4, 7 | Buried verbs and delayed subjects | D5, D6, D10 | |
| 6 | You changed the leanest correct option | — see below | |
| 8 | You applied concision before checking grammar | — see below |
If you missed 6 or 8, or both: these are the two items that test the limits of the rule rather than the rule. Missing 6 means you assume the underlined portion must be wrong. Missing 8 means you reached for the shortest option without checking it was a sentence. Both are more costly than any padded phrase, because both are habits rather than gaps.